Dýchacie cesty a dýchanie u dieťaťa – anatomické odlišnosti oproti dospelému v prednemocničnej starostlivosti, séria PED diel 2

Airway and Breathing in Children

Zdieľajte
Series PED — The Pediatric Patient · Part 02

Airway and Breathing in Children

Anatomical and physiological differences that determine equipment choice, technique, and the speed of decompensation

A child’s respiratory system isn’t a scaled-down copy of an adult’s — it’s a different system with different geometry, different reserve, and different failure dynamics. That’s exactly why respiratory distress is among the most common and also the most severe reasons for calling EMS to a pediatric patient, and that’s exactly why this second installment of the PED series builds on anatomical and physiological foundations, without which discussing any further intervention makes no sense.

Key thesis A smaller airway diameter, higher metabolic oxygen consumption, and lower functional residual capacity cause a child to desaturate faster and with less reserve than an adult. Preoxygenation and speed of decision-making carry greater weight in pediatrics than in the adult patient.

Anatomical differences in the upper airway

Head, occiput, and positioning

The newborn and infant have a relatively large head with a prominent occiput. In the supine position, this causes passive neck flexion, which can by itself lead to airway obstruction. Whereas in an adult the “sniffing position” with head elevation is used to achieve a patent airway, in an infant it’s often necessary to instead elevate the shoulders to compensate for the flexion caused by the large occiput and achieve a neutral head position.

Tongue and oral cavity

A child’s tongue is proportionally larger relative to the size of the oral cavity than in an adult. This narrows the space for laryngoscopy and increases the risk of obstruction by soft tissues — particularly in an unconscious patient, where loss of muscle tone pushes the tongue further back.

Position of the larynx

A child’s larynx sits higher and further forward than in an adult — roughly at the level of the C3–C4 vertebrae, whereas in an adult it’s at C4–C5. This position, together with a larger and more pliable epiglottis (often described as “omega”-shaped), makes direct visualization of the vocal cords during laryngoscopy more difficult and is one reason why pediatric laryngoscopy requires specific practice.

Shape and narrowest point of the airway

Traditional teaching describes the pediatric airway as funnel-shaped, with the narrowest point at the level of the cricoid cartilage — unlike in an adult, where the narrowest point is the glottic opening. This concept underlies the long-standing practice of preferring uncuffed endotracheal tubes in young children.

Clinical note — an ongoing professional debate Newer imaging studies (CT, MRI, video bronchoscopy) call the classic “funnel-shaped” model into question and suggest that the narrowest point may actually be the glottic/subglottic region, and that the airway shape is closer to cylindrical, similar to adults. The question remains a subject of professional debate, and conclusions differ across imaging methodologies. The clinically important consequence of this research is the expanded use of cuffed endotracheal tubes with a low-pressure cuff even in young children — this topic will be covered in detail in the POM-DC series.

Physiological differences in breathing

ParameterChild (particularly infant)Adult
Oxygen consumptionsignificantly higher per kg of body weightlower per kg of body weight
Functional residual capacitylower, smaller oxygen reservehigher reserve
Type of breathingpredominantly diaphragmaticboth thoracic and diaphragmatic
Chest wall compliancehigh — cartilaginous ribslower, more rigid
Nasal breathingnewborn/infant predominantly obligate nasal breathersfree nose/mouth transition

High chest wall compliance means a child more readily shows visible retractions — jugular, intercostal, subcostal — with increased work of breathing, which is a valuable but also treacherous indicator: with exhaustion of the respiratory muscles, retractions can paradoxically diminish, which is NOT a sign of improvement, but of impending failure.

Caution — a false sense of reassurance The disappearance of visible retractions in an exhausted child with a preceding severe respiratory distress isn’t automatically a favorable finding. It can signal exhaustion of the respiratory muscles and impending respiratory failure. Always assess it in the context of the overall level of consciousness, skin color, and auscultatory finding.

Newborns and young infants up to roughly 2–4 months of age are considered predominantly obligate nasal breathers. Obstruction of the nasal passages (mucus, edema) in this group can cause disproportionately severe respiratory distress compared to the same finding in an older child or adult.

Practical implications for the paramedic

Summary for practice
  • For an infant, consider elevating the shoulders (not the head) to achieve a neutral airway position.
  • Expect faster desaturation — preoxygenation before any airway instrumentation carries higher priority than in an adult.
  • Clearing the nasal passages (suctioning, saline) can be more therapeutically significant in a young infant than it might first appear.
  • Assess the disappearance of retractions after a period of severe respiratory distress cautiously — it may indicate exhaustion, not improvement.
  • Equipment size (airway adjunct, mask, laryngoscope blade) depends on both age and individual anatomy — reference tables will be part of the POM-DC series.

Connection to the next part of the series

In PED-03, we’ll move from the airway to the cardiovascular system and thermoregulation — two further areas where age has a fundamental effect on how quickly and in what way a child decompensates.

PED-02 Airway and Breathing Next part: PED-03 — Cardiovascular System and Thermoregulation →
Sources
  • Van de Voorde P, Turner NM, Djakow J, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Paediatric Life Support. Resuscitation. 2021.
  • Holzki J, Laschat M, Puder C. The anatomy of the pediatric airway: Has our knowledge changed in 120 years? A review of historic and recent investigations of the anatomy of the pediatric larynx. Pediatric Anesthesia. 2018.
  • Litman RS, et al. Pediatric laryngeal dimensions: an age-based analysis. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2009.
  • Evolution of the concepts of pediatric airway anatomy and clinical implications. Journal of Pediatric Critical Care. 2023.
MS
Martin Semanco, EMT-P
Administrator and editor of zachranarjecool.eu · Paramedic, RZP Leopoldov

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *