V2 — Alkohol, lieky a spôsobilosť —čo zákon hovorí o vodičovi ZZS

Alcohol, Medications, and EMS Driver Fitness

Zdieľajte
Alcohol, Medications, and EMS Driver Fitness | zachranarjecool.eu
Series: VZ-LEG · VZ-LEG-03

Alcohol, Medications, and
What the Law Says About EMS Driver Fitness

Zero tolerance for alcohol applies to every driver without exception — including an ambulance driver. The same principle applies to medications that reduce the ability to drive. But the law also addresses situations that occur more commonly in the EMS environment than it might seem.

Martin Semanco, EMT-P ◦ Paramedic, RZP Leopoldov ◦ Series: VZ-LEG · Part 3 ◦ Category: Legislation

An EMS driver is not an ordinary employee — they operate a vehicle with the right of priority driving, in urgent situations, under pressure. Precisely for this reason, the law places extraordinary demands on their fitness. Alcohol, prescription medications, and over-the-counter preparations can all be reasons a driver must not report for a shift.

Zero tolerance for alcohol — no exceptions

In Slovakia, motor vehicle drivers are subject to absolute zero tolerance for alcohol. Act No. 8/2009 Coll. on Road Traffic, in § 4(2)(b)–(d), prohibits a driver from consuming alcohol while driving, from driving after consuming alcohol while it may still be present in the body, and from driving if their ability to drive is impaired.

§ 4(2)(b)–(d) — Act No. 8/2009 Coll.

The driver must not: (b) consume alcohol or another addictive substance while driving; (c) drive at a time after consuming alcohol or another addictive substance when it may still be present in their body; (d) drive after taking a medication at a time when the medication may reduce their ability to drive.

Source: § 4(2) of Act No. 8/2009 Coll. on Road Traffic, as amended

For an EMS driver, this results in a single rule: 0.00‰. No exception for “one beer the night before,” no exception for a night shift, no exception for priority driving. The body eliminates alcohol at a rate of approximately 0.10–0.15‰ per hour — the driver must be able to calculate when they are truly sober.

Penalties for driving under the influence — three tiers

Alcohol behind the wheel — penalty structure (Act No. 8/2009 Coll. and Criminal Code No. 300/2005 Coll.)
0.01 – 0.99‰
Offense — § 22 of Act No. 372/1990 Coll. on Offenses. Fine €300–1,300, activity ban 1–5 years. Handled by the traffic inspectorate in administrative proceedings. For an EMS driver: automatic loss of fitness to drive an EMS vehicle and likely termination of employment.
≥ 1.00‰
Criminal offense — § 289 of the Criminal Code: endangerment while under the influence of an addictive substance. Imprisonment up to 2 years (§ 289(1)), up to 5 years for a particularly hazardous occupation (§ 289(4) — driving a mass-transit or emergency vehicle). Activity ban, monetary penalty.
Refusing the test
Equivalent to a criminal offense — refusing a breathalyzer or blood test is considered committing the crime of endangerment while under the influence (§ 289 of the Criminal Code), even if the exact amount of alcohol wasn’t determined. A ruling by the Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic confirmed the constitutionality of this principle.
⚠ Specific risk for the EMS driver — § 289(4) of the Criminal Code

The Criminal Code, in § 289(4), classifies the crime of endangerment while under the influence as more serious if the perpetrator carries out an occupation or activity in which the influence of an addictive substance is particularly hazardous — and explicitly names operating a mass-transit vehicle. An emergency vehicle transporting a critically ill patient falls into the same category in terms of the degree of danger.

The penalty range under § 289(4): 2 to 5 years of imprisonment.

Medications — an underestimated risk in the EMS environment

Medications are a topic EMS drivers systematically underestimate. The law is clear on this point: § 4(2)(d) of Act No. 8/2009 Coll. prohibits driving after taking a medication if that medication may reduce the ability to drive safely. It doesn’t matter whether it’s a prescription or over-the-counter medication.

The duty to warn the driver of this prohibition falls on the physician — Decree of the Slovak Ministry of Health No. 164/1997 Coll. on medical fitness to drive a motor vehicle, in § 5, requires the physician to inform the patient (driver) when prescribing such a medication and to record this fact in the medical documentation. Responsibility for complying with the prohibition, however, remains with the driver.

Medication categoryExamplesEffect on drivingEMS driver’s procedure
First-generation antihistaminesDithiaden, Prothazin, promethazineStrong sedation, significantly slowed reactionsDoes not drive. Report to the shift supervisor.
BenzodiazepinesDiazepam, Xanax, Neurol, DormicumSedation, impaired coordination, slowed reactionsDoes not drive. Report to the shift supervisor.
Opioid analgesicsTramadol, codeine, morphineSedation, impaired attentionDoes not drive. Report to the shift supervisor.
Some antidepressants / antipsychoticsTrittico, Zoloft (start of treatment), haloperidolDepends on dose and treatment phase — see the package leaflet warningConsult the prescribing physician. When in doubt, does not drive.
Second-generation antihistaminesLoratadine, cetirizine, Claritine, ZyrtecMinimal sedative effect at therapeutic dosesUsually no restriction — watch for combination with alcohol.
Common analgesicsParacetamol, ibuprofen, ASANo effect on driving at standard dosingNo restriction.
How to check whether a medication affects the ability to drive

Every medication registered in Slovakia must include, in its Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) and package leaflet, information on the effect on the ability to drive. Look for the section “Effects on ability to drive and use machines.” If there’s any warning there — consult a physician before reporting for a shift. This information is available on the portal adc.sk (Slovak Administrative Database of Medicines).

Reduced fitness from other causes

The law, in § 4(2)(e), also prohibits driving when a driver’s ability is reduced by injury, illness, indisposition, or fatigue. This provision is extremely important for an EMS driver — and, in practice, the most commonly ignored.

Situations when an EMS driver must not drive — § 4(2)(e)
Fatigue
After a night shift without sleep, after more than 12 hours of active duty — if the driver feels their reaction time and attention are reduced, the law prohibits them from driving. This applies in EMS too.
Acute illness
Fever, severe migraine, dizziness, vomiting — conditions that objectively reduce the ability to drive safely. The driver is obligated to report this and decline the call.
Injury
Injury to a hand, leg, or another body part affecting vehicle control — the driver must assess whether they can drive safely, and when in doubt, report it to the shift supervisor.
Psychological strain
A severe personal crisis, acute stress — not directly named in the law, but can reduce the ability to drive under § 4(2)(e). The shift supervisor should be able to release such a driver from a call.

The duty to submit to a breathalyzer test

Act No. 8/2009 Coll., in § 4(3), obligates a driver to submit to a breathalyzer test, or possibly a blood draw, at a police officer’s request. This duty applies without exception — including for an ambulance driver, even during a call.

§ 4(3) — Act No. 8/2009 Coll.

A driver is obligated to submit, at a police officer’s request, to an examination determining whether they are under the influence of alcohol or another addictive substance, whether by breathalyzer test or medical examination including a blood or other biological sample.

Source: § 4(3) of Act No. 8/2009 Coll. on Road Traffic

Refusing a breathalyzer test is a crime — regardless of the actual amount of alcohol in the blood. The Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic confirmed that this is an omission-based crime completed by the refusal itself. For an EMS driver, this means: if a police officer stops you and requests a breathalyzer test — always submit to it, even during a call. The officer has the right to stop them and administer the test; the driver has the right to request the process be expedited due to the EMS call, but not to refuse.

Three scenarios from practice

Scenario A
A driver reports for a night shift — having drunk alcohol the evening before

The driver drank 3 beers (about 1.5‰) the evening before their shift. The shift starts at 06:00. Alcohol is eliminated at a rate of 0.12‰/hour — at 06:00 they still have about 0.3‰ in their blood.

Legal position: The driver must not report for the shift — they would be breaching § 4(2)(c) of Act No. 8/2009 Coll. If a police officer checked them and found 0.3‰, it’s an offense with a fine of €300–1,300 and an activity ban. The driver is obligated to report this to the shift supervisor and decline the call.
Scenario B
A driver takes prescribed diazepam for anxiety — and reports for a shift

The driver is prescribed diazepam 5 mg at night for an anxiety disorder. They report for a day shift in the morning — the medication is still active.

Legal position: Diazepam is a benzodiazepine with a proven effect on driving ability. The driver breaches § 4(2)(d) of Act No. 8/2009 Coll. They are obligated to inform the shift supervisor and not drive. Long-term solution: consult the prescribing physician about a dosing change or a substitute without sedative effect.
Scenario C
A police officer stops the ambulance during a call and requests a breathalyzer test

The EMS crew is rushing to a priority-1 call. A police officer stops the vehicle and requests a breathalyzer test from the driver.

Legal position: The driver is obligated to submit to the test — refusal is a crime. Procedure: stop, submit to the breathalyzer test, inform the officer of the nature of the call and request expediting. Immediately inform dispatch of the delay and request a replacement crew be sent to the patient. If the driver is sober, the whole procedure takes 2–3 minutes.

The EMS driver’s commitment — personal responsibility

Five rules to follow

1. Calculate your sobriety time. Before every shift, check whether you’re truly sober. Rule of thumb: number of promille × 10 hours = minimum time before a call.

2. Check the package leaflet of every medication. If there’s any warning in the driving section — report it to the shift supervisor before reporting for duty.

3. Report, don’t hide. The shift supervisor has a legal duty to ensure a fit driver. A driver who reports a reason for unfitness is protected — a driver who hides it and causes an accident bears criminal liability.

4. Never refuse a breathalyzer test. Refusal is a crime — without exception and regardless of the actual state.

5. Fatigue is a legal reason to decline a call. § 4(2)(e) — a driver must not drive if their ability is reduced by fatigue. This isn’t weakness, it’s a legal duty.

From practice — why this topic is taboo in EMS
EMS drivers are under pressure from a collective expectation that they “always report.” Reporting unfitness — whether for a medication, fatigue, or a health problem — is perceived as weakness or a burden on the team. The result is that some drivers report for a shift in a state in which, by law, they should not be driving. The law doesn’t support this culture — it supports the opposite. A shift supervisor who pressures an unfit driver into a call can share liability for any resulting crime. The EMS system must have a functioning mechanism that protects a driver who reports unfitness — not one that punishes them.
  1. VZ-LEG-01 — Driving Under Blue Lights — Legal Framework and Driver Responsibility
  2. VZ-LEG-02 — EMS Driver Liability in a Traffic Accident During a Call
  3. VZ-LEG-03 — Alcohol, Medications, and EMS Driver Fitness (this article)
Sources and legislative references
  1. Slovak Act No. 8/2009 Coll. on Road Traffic, § 4(2)(b)–(e) — prohibitions for the driver; § 4(3) — duty to submit to a breathalyzer test.
  2. Slovak Act No. 300/2005 Coll. (Criminal Code), § 289 — endangerment while under the influence of an addictive substance (paragraphs 1–4).
  3. Slovak Act No. 372/1990 Coll. on Offenses, § 22 — alcohol-related road traffic offenses.
  4. Decree of the Slovak Ministry of Health No. 164/1997 Coll. on medical fitness to drive a motor vehicle, § 5 — physician’s duty to warn the driver about medications reducing fitness to drive.
  5. Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic — refusal of a breathalyzer test as an omission-based crime; confirmation of the constitutionality of § 289 of the Criminal Code. ustavnysud.sk
  6. Ficek, defense attorney. Endangerment while under the influence of an addictive substance — commentary on § 289 of the Criminal Code. obhajca-ficek.sk, 2026.
  7. Slovak Administrative Database of Medicines (adc.sk) — SPCs and package leaflets.
  8. Slovak Act No. 579/2004 Coll. on Emergency Medical Services, § 10 — paramedic duties, including the duty to report for work fit for duty.
Martin Semanco, EMT-P

Paramedic with more than 15 years of experience in prehospital emergency care, RZP Leopoldov. Administrator and editor of zachranarjecool.eu. Author of the VZ-LEG series.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *